Skip to main content

Why I'm happy and why it matters, by Renée Hlozek


While I was still working at Caltech earlier this year Renée Hlozek (pronounced "logic")---Princeton astrophysicist, cosmology theorist and statistics badass---stopped through Pasadena to give a science talk. During her visit she gave me advice for mentoring women astronomy students and we also shared our thoughts on the underrepresentation of women in astrophysics, particularly at the faculty level. One important aspect that we identified was the environment provided by various departments, and how some work environments are caustic for women (and minorities) while others are extremely welcoming. Renée identified Princeton Astronomy (good ol' Peyton Hall) as an exemplar among astronomy departments in offering a healthy atmosphere for women astronomers. I asked her to elaborate and she was kind enough to put together this guest post.

I'm about to start the third year of a postdoc in the department of Astrophysics at Princeton University, and I love my job. And I love coming to work. And I am a woman. It may not seem like loving my job my gender would be related, but for a while now I've been thinking that my love for my job is at least partly linked to my department's policies about young researchers and towards women in science.



The Princeton Astrophysics department is filled with leaders in the field and I don't mind admitting that I was pretty nervous the first time I visited, let alone before I started here. I've been to other departments where as a visitor I felt isolated, and where I've felt the department wasn't as open or friendly, so I thought I'd take note of a few reasons why it is a pleasure to work here. Is it always relaxed and easy? No. Do I sometimes get frustrated at ego-driven debate? Yes. But I feel respected in the department and that people are open to listening to my ideas, rather than just dismissing them. It is a reality of our field that this is really not always the case at other places.
  1. The department has an open doors policy - and people make a real effort to chat to visitors when they come to the department. Now just having an open doors policy does not necessarily mean that all people have a voice, but I've found that faculty are supportive of events such as the discussion groups on diversity and equity (even when that support is hanging back from a discussion in order to give people space to discuss things that might be hard to mention openly) and request feedback on ways to make the department better.
  2. The Astrophysics department here at Princeton is trying to increase the numbers of women in the department at all levels. Now, with numbers being roughly 24% at all levels (more specifically 30% undergraduate majors, 16% postdocs and research assistants and 25% faculty), we still have quite a way to go, but the department has shown with recent hires that they want to increase that percentage. This makes me feel less like a 'foreign body' as a woman. That being said we, like many places, definitely need to do more to increase the number of members in our department who are minorities, but the university as a whole is strongly invested in tackling the issue of diversity in the university, and I recently attended a very worthwhile workshop on the topic (http://www.princeton.edu/diversity/news/).
  3. We have astro coffee to discuss new results every morning. That is also a great way to welcome
    "Grand Central Station" in Peyton Hall
    visitors and helps you take the pulse of the department. The postdocs and some grad students make an effort to eat lunch together about once a week, and this helps us stay connected. Initially I was a bit worried that there was lots of inter-postdoc interaction but not much interaction between grad students and postdocs, but now with a regular movie night things are improved and there is more interaction across lines - something I see as critical to make all members feel included in the department.
  4. Babies and pets a welcome at work. I have neither a baby or a dog, but the fact that the department is relaxed and people feel like they are accommodated makes for a happier place. This was the thing I was most surprised to find, and makes a huge difference.
  5. We have a semi-formal system in place to provide me with mentorship, and I could choose my mentor. I also then can mentor grad students, should they take advantage of that (and we are actively trying to find better ways to make it work). In addition the chair and co-chair of the department make an effort to actually keep informed on how I'm doing not only in my work life, but also if there are other issues that I might be facing. That doesn't mean we have heart-to-heart chats every day, but I feel like if I have a problem I'm not actually alone. This started right from the very beginning when the admin staff were super helpful in getting me moved from the UK and settling me in.
A dog. At work! Who's a silly doggie
writing Pyton on a laptop? Who's that?!
Can the doggie write Python while
getting his ears scritched? Ooooh!
So why do I keep mentioning things being friendly? Well personally I find if there is too much ego-driven academic aggression I get disheartened because it gets in the way of science. This is of course not something that affects only women, everyone benefits from a good working environment. What I enjoy is that there are allies at Princeton Astrophysics that hear me out and actively want to create a department where its members are seen as whole people, rather than just wheels in a production machine of science.

In addition, while there is much still to do before we have equal numbers of women and men in our department, the attitudes and policies within the department make me feel like it is a priority within Princeton Astrophysics to increase the female to male ratio. 

We keep hearing discouraging news about women in science, and we have a long way to go. But I think not only are there concrete things we can do now, but we can take encouragement from places where good decisions are being made. And if you create a place people want to be in, they are more likely to be happy, healthy and productive. And that is why it matters that I love my job.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

back-talk begins

me: "owen, come here. it's time to get a new diaper" him, sprinting down the hall with no pants on: "forget about it!" he's quoting benny the rabbit, a short-lived sesame street character who happens to be in his favorite "count with me" video. i'm turning my head, trying not to let him see me laugh, because his use and tone with the phrase are so spot-on.

The Long Con

Hiding in Plain Sight ESPN has a series of sports documentaries called 30 For 30. One of my favorites is called Broke  which is about how professional athletes often make tens of millions of dollars in their careers yet retire with nothing. One of the major "leaks" turns out to be con artists, who lure athletes into elaborate real estate schemes or business ventures. This naturally raises the question: In a tightly-knit social structure that is a sports team, how can con artists operate so effectively and extensively? The answer is quite simple: very few people taken in by con artists ever tell anyone what happened. Thus, con artists can operate out in the open with little fear of consequences because they are shielded by the collective silence of their victims. I can empathize with this. I've lost money in two different con schemes. One was when I was in college, and I received a phone call that I had won an all-expenses-paid trip to the Bahamas. All I needed to d

Reader Feedback: Whither Kanake in (white) Astronomy?

Watching the way that the debate about the TMT has come into our field has angered and saddened me so much. Outward blatant racism and then deflecting and defending. I don't want to post this because I am a chicken and fairly vulnerable given my status as a postdoc (Editor's note: How sad is it that our young astronomers feel afraid to speak out on this issue? This should make clear the power dynamics at play in this debate) .  But I thought the number crunching I did might be useful for those on the fence. I wanted to see how badly astronomy itself is failing Native Hawaiians. I'm not trying to get into all of the racist infrastructure that has created an underclass on Hawaii, but if we are going to argue about "well it wasn't astronomers who did it," we should be able to back that assertion with numbers. Having tried to do so, well I think the argument has no standing. At all.  Based on my research, it looks like there are about 1400 jobs in Hawaii r