Skip to main content

Extra-solar water-bearing asteroids!

A number of friends have contacted me about this press release about evidence of water-rich asteroids outside of the Solar System. The first thing to realize about professional astronomers is that they rarely know what's going on with other people's press releases. The second thing to realize is that those press releases are usually pretty different than the papers from which they originate.

The reason is that a press release is meant for the public, and often emphasizes aspects of the specific research project that are most interesting to the average person. However, astronomers are typically more interested in the "boring" or mundane details of the research. Thus, there exists an incompatibility. That, coupled with the fact that we don't usually have time in our days to check the Science section of our local papers means that astronomers typically miss one another's press releases and the pop-sci stories that flow from them.

However, sometimes the science is so basic and so universally cool that your neighborhood astronomer has, in fact, heard about it. And so was the case with the water-bearing exo-asteroid discovered by Jay Farihi and collaborators (Farihi et al. 2013, Nature). This group of astronomers have made a living looking at white dwarf stars with strange chemical abundances. White dwarfs are the end-states of stars like the Sun. Think of them as white-hot skeletons of stars. Once our Sun dies, it'll slough off it's outer layers and lay bare it's hot, ultra-dense core. That core is basically hydrogen and helium supported by an exotic type of pressure known as electron degeneracy pressure (see the wiki page for more details).

Jay Farihi: Hard. Core. Astronomer.
White dwarfs are interesting to astronomers like Jay Farihi because they are extremely simple. Being composed almost exclusively of light elements, any time heavier elements such as carbon or silicon or iron are somehow deposited on their surface, those heavy atoms immediately sink deep into the middle of the white dwarf. Thus, if astronomers such as Jay Farihi see heavy elements on the surfaces of white dwarfs, those heavy elements are being "poured" onto the surface of the white dwarf at a steady rate.

A tidally-disrupted asteroid around a white dwarf.
The mechanism pouring heavy stuff onto white dwarfs is usually a swarm of rocky asteroids that are pulled apart by the intense gravitational field of the white dwarf. These tidally-disrupted asteroids form a disk of heavy-element-rich material that then falls onto (accretes) onto the white dwarf where it is visible through spectroscopy.

Farihi et al. noticed that there was an excess of oxygen on one particular white dwarf, and through some detective work they figured out that that oxygen came primarily in the form of water (two hydrogens and an oxygen atom). In fact, the asteroid responsible for these spectroscopic signatures was composed of 26% water by mass! Even more exciting is the exotic environment in which this water was detected. How cool is the thought of the material necessary for life being found around a stellar skeleton? Astronomy! Science! Fun!

Check out the paper on the arXiv.


John Johnson said…
Saurabh notes: those white dwarfs are almost all carbon/oxygen rather than hydrogen/helium (with standard non-binary stellar evolution anyway), but those heavier elements sink quickly leaving the H/He on the surface.
CyndiF said… I more excited that they used my instrument (COS) or annoyed that they didn't cite our ApJ instrument paper?

Close call.

Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:

It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The subtle yet real racism of the Supreme Court

Judge Roberts, a member of the highest court in the land, which is currently hearing the sad story of mediocre college aspirant Abigail Fischer, recently asked, "What unique ­perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class? I’m just wondering what the benefits of diversity are in that situation?" 
Did you catch the white supremacy in this question? If not, don't feel bad because it's subtly hidden beneath the cloaking field of colorblind racism. (As for Scalia's ign'nt-ass statements, I'm not even...)
Try rephrasing the question: "What unique perspective does a white student bring to a physics classroom?" The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing! Why? Because race isn't biological, and is therefore not deterministic of cognitive abilities. Did you perhaps forget that you knew that when considering Roberts' question? If so, again, it's understandable. Our society and culture condition all of us to forget basic facts …