Skip to main content

Marcus vs. Owen (t = 1 hr)

Here's a comparison of Owen's and Marcus' baby pictures at 1 hour old. Erin and I have differing opinions: one thinks the two boys look different as newborns, the other thinks they look very similar. Not that it matters too much, seeing as they're both perfect in every way. What do you think?

Comments

Code name: 1% said…
All new babies look the same: squished. That said, the differences between these two are subtle. First glance = same baby. Second glance = related babies.
Amy Van Hook said…
owen had more hair-or at least it was farther down on his forehead. plus, like you said, owen was 22% bigger. maybe it's because marcus's arms are bent, but owen's arms look longer. but they totally look like brothers. more alike than me, erin and brian looked at teeny-tiny stage.
Owen lacks definition in his pecs, but clearly has an advantage in overall bulk. Marcus appears to have toned up for this competition, but I question his hairstyle choice as it makes him look a bit like United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia - http://www.ocregister.com/newsimages/local/2005/08/30chapman.jpg. It's interesting to note that the brothers have both opted for the left-handed CLAW pose. I'm seeing great things in the boys' future.
both amazing and yummy! i think they look pretty similar!
Aunt Linda said…
I think they are both alike in their perfection. Kelly thinks all babies look like ET..the only difference is some are with and some are without hair. He did say that they got their good looks from John because Erin still has hers.

Hugs from Houston.

J,K,L and M

Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:


It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The Long Con

Hiding in Plain Sight

ESPN has a series of sports documentaries called 30 For 30. One of my favorites is called Broke which is about how professional athletes often make tens of millions of dollars in their careers yet retire with nothing. One of the major "leaks" turns out to be con artists, who lure athletes into elaborate real estate schemes or business ventures. This naturally raises the question: In a tightly-knit social structure that is a sports team, how can con artists operate so effectively and extensively? The answer is quite simple: very few people taken in by con artists ever tell anyone what happened. Thus, con artists can operate out in the open with little fear of consequences because they are shielded by the collective silence of their victims.
I can empathize with this. I've lost money in two different con schemes. One was when I was in college, and I received a phone call that I had won an all-expenses-paid trip to the Bahamas. All I needed to do was p…