Skip to main content

I'm back! In more ways than one


Regular readers have noticed that I've been away from blogging at this site for a while. This happens periodically when my creative muses flit off in directions away from writing. I also needed to take a deep breath after an extremely busy semester. Hooray for Summer! Another reason is that I've been doing quite a bit of blogging over at Women In Astronomy

But never fear, I have returned! For now. 

Not only am I going to start posting again (for now), I have also decided to take my own advice and created a new website. It's embarrassing that I've been at Harvard for almost a year, and yet my group's only web presence is at my old Caltech site. D'oh!

So I present to you, dear readers, The Johnson ExoLab @Harvard! Since Apple discontinued iWeb, I decided to try out an online WYSIWYG editor called Wix. I have to admit, I didn't search and test drive many options. But after signing up for a premium account, I really like the Wix editor interface, and $12.99/mo isn't bad for all the features you get with a premium account. 

Comments

Johanna said…
I love your introduction, "Of all the wonderful diversity we experience day to day, there is one thing we all have in common: planet Earth." I hope more astronomy (and all STEM) labs adopt a philosophy similar to the one you advocate through ExoLab.

Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:


It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The subtle yet real racism of the Supreme Court

Judge Roberts, a member of the highest court in the land, which is currently hearing the sad story of mediocre college aspirant Abigail Fischer, recently asked, "What unique ­perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class? I’m just wondering what the benefits of diversity are in that situation?" 
Did you catch the white supremacy in this question? If not, don't feel bad because it's subtly hidden beneath the cloaking field of colorblind racism. (As for Scalia's ign'nt-ass statements, I'm not even...)
Try rephrasing the question: "What unique perspective does a white student bring to a physics classroom?" The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing! Why? Because race isn't biological, and is therefore not deterministic of cognitive abilities. Did you perhaps forget that you knew that when considering Roberts' question? If so, again, it's understandable. Our society and culture condition all of us to forget basic facts …