Skip to main content

First Planet Detection From Minerva

An artist's impression of the WASP-12 planetary system.
The Project Minerva team has been hard at work calibrating and characterizing Telescope #1, which is in an Aqawan enclosure on California Blvd, on the Caltech campus in Pasadena. This test rig allows us to work out the kinks with the telescope and enclosure control systems without having to fly/drive back and forth from campus to an observatory. Having a test rig right next to the Minerva team's offices has paid huge dividends thus far. We have overcome a major telescope hardware/software malfunction, identified improper coatings on some of our optical elements, and brought our telescope throughput up to spec, all in far less time than it would have taken if we went straight to the mountaintop.

This past Sunday night, Caltech postdoc Jon Swift and fourth-year PhD candidate Mike Bottom were at the controls of the telescope measuring the amount of starlight that makes it through the telescope optics and onto the actual detector, known as the telescope throughput. To do this, they measured the flux received from several well-characterized standard stars over a range of air masses. After running their tests they found a system throughput of 72%, which is very close to spec (at long last!).
Jon Swift and me giving a tour of the Minerva test facility at Caltech.
Photo courtesy Mike Wong.
With clear, stable skies overhead, they decided to look at a far less stable star named WASP-12. The star has a hot Jupiter that was discovered by the Wide-Angle Search for Planets (WASP) team back in 2009, in a paper led by my collaborator Leslie Hebb (See Hebb et al. 2009 for the gory details). With the planet scheduled to transit WASP-12 in less than an hour, Jon and Mike slewed the telescope to the star's coordinates and set up on the field. The plan was to repeatedly image WASP-12 and the stars within ~10 arcminutes (~1/6 of a degree) on either side of it. 

When photons from the star strike pixels on our CCD array, electrons are freed via the photoelectric effect from the silicon substrate, and the number of free electrons floating in each pixel is proportional to the amount of flux received. By summing the total number of electrons in all of the pixels on which the star's image fell, Jon and Mike measured the star's flux in time. However, due to variations in the transparency in the Earth's atmosphere above the telescope, these absolute flux levels vary. Fortunately, the other stars in the field of view also vary with the atmospheric transparency, so the ratio of WASP-12 to the nearby comparison stars provides a relative flux measurement.

Once the planet blocked the star, the flux level dropped by an amount approximately equal to the radius of the planet squared, $R_P^2$, divided by the radius of the star, $R_\star^2$, or ${\rm depth} = (R_P/R_\star)^2$. Here's what Jon and Mike observed during the 4.8 hour observing sequence:

This is Project Minerva's first planet! Granted, it had already been discovered, but this light curve is ours and we're very, very proud of it. See also Jason Wright's writeup over at his blog.

Our primary science goal is to search for planets using precise Doppler-shift measurements. Our secondary science goal is to search for previously unknown transits of RV-detected planets, and until our spectrometer is ready, we'll be doing a lot of transit work. For our targets we'll know that our transit targets have planets, and we'll have predictions for when transits should occur if the geometry of the orbit is just right. 

This test shows that we can achieve the precision necessary to detect a transiting hot Jupiter. The great news is that Jon did the simplest possible data reduction and analysis procedure, so this is likely an underestimate of our attainable photometric precision. Also, the camera was a loaner; we'll soon purchase a camera better optimized for transit work. Says Jon:
You also might want to add the fun facts that these measurements were made 40 ft from E. California Blvd. where cars whiz by, street lights flicker, and we are losing anywhere from 20 to 50% of our light just from the atmosphere alone!
Our hope is to regularly achieve a photometric precision better than 1 part in a 1000 per minute, or about 1 millimag per minute (For more, check out Greg Laughlin's post on ground-based photometry.)


Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:

It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The subtle yet real racism of the Supreme Court

Judge Roberts, a member of the highest court in the land, which is currently hearing the sad story of mediocre college aspirant Abigail Fischer, recently asked, "What unique ­perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class? I’m just wondering what the benefits of diversity are in that situation?" 
Did you catch the white supremacy in this question? If not, don't feel bad because it's subtly hidden beneath the cloaking field of colorblind racism. (As for Scalia's ign'nt-ass statements, I'm not even...)
Try rephrasing the question: "What unique perspective does a white student bring to a physics classroom?" The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing! Why? Because race isn't biological, and is therefore not deterministic of cognitive abilities. Did you perhaps forget that you knew that when considering Roberts' question? If so, again, it's understandable. Our society and culture condition all of us to forget basic facts …