Skip to main content

On Trump: When you gotta take a clown seriously

Hey, hey, kids! It's Donald and his anti-immigrant crew
My good friend Jorge Moreno​ recently said, "White privilege is being able to say, nonchalantly, that Trump has no chance of becoming president." It was a very consciousness-raising comment for me to hear, and definitely one that has stuck. If you "look" like you belong in this country, then Trump's racist, xenophobic vitriol sounds as nasty as it is, but it doesn't really sink home when there's no risk of his policies becoming reality, thereby threatening your livelihood and life. 


Yes, Trump is a clown. But an uncomfortably large fraction of white Americans not only enjoy watching his clown show, but would be willing to have him lead our country (48% of white Americans view him favorably). This simple statistic should be screaming one obvious message to all of us, and it's not about Trump. It's about white America, and what white America really thinks about non-white Americans. I've seen other explanations for how such a large fraction of our country can mobilize behind such an ignorant, oafish, incurious man with zero foreign policy experience or cogent opinions about how to run our country (he considers a question from a conservative journalist about the names of the leaders of ISIS, Hezbollah and Hamas a "gotcha question." You can't make this up!). But he does hate those "illegals" and he has big plans involving walls and mass deportations. White America apparently eats this up.
Image credit: Peter Steiner
What's particularly galling is that Trump doesn't have to succeed to "win" on this issue. He's already affecting the lives of Latin@ and Hispanic people in our country, whether they are documented citizens, working here on green cards, or in the US without documentation (there are no "illegal" people. "Legal immigrant" status is a social construct, and a recent one at that. All people [should] have the legal right to pursue life, liberty and happiness). How does Trump's racism affect real people? His endorsement of systemic racism provides encouragement, fuel and cover for overt, interpersonal racism. Here's an eye-opening article on this topic from Tina Vasquez writing for The Guardian. An excerpt:
I’ve lived in Los Angeles for 29 of my 30 years. As a light-skinned, biracial Latina in one of the most diverse and Mexican-centric cities in the nation, I have never been asked the type of questions I’m now fielding from white people. I’m not the only one experiencing an uptick in seemingly out-of-the-blue racist exchanges. Latina journalist Aura Bogado recently tweeted about a strange interaction at a grocery store. My father recently told me a white neighbor he’s been friendly with since moving into the neighborhood 15 years ago, casually inquired about his citizenship status. As the days go on, I hear more of these kinds of stories from Latino friends and family members. 
For an elegant, well-researched, yet depressing framework for understanding what's going down right now, and what has been going down since ~1960 when the Party of Lincoln collectively went on the warpath against people of color, check out Ian Haney Lopez's Dog Whistle Politics. I also recommend Aviva Chomsky's Undocumented (yup, she's the daughter of Noam and Carol Chomsky. h/t Jorge for the reco!), and Juan Gonzalez's Harvest of Empire (available in both book and movie format). But all that is contained in these resources is nicely summed up by Vasquez:
White Americans can argue Trump is the all-American underdog, the anti-PC, shoot-from-the-hip politician they’ve been waiting for; that their support stems from an appreciation for someone willing to stand up for everything that once made America “great.” Yes, Trump is unabashedly American – in the way that racism and xenophobia are as American as apple pie. 

Comments

CyndiF said…
I hope this doesn't come across as a "me too" statement**, but I'm also struck about how many people (and not just men) are eating it up when the Donald goes after women like Meghan Kelly and Carly Fiorina in blatantly gendered terms. He's definitely throwing red meat to a certain demographic (including, I am sorry to say, members of my own family).

**Because they aren't experienced the same way, really: I am sorry to see so many people think it's the height of reasoned debate to invoke a woman's looks in a policy debate but I can just roll my eyes and move on in a way minorities can't.
Boris Yeltsin said…
"(he considers a question from a conservative journalist about the names of the leaders of ISIS, Hezbollah and Hamas a "gotcha question." You can't make this up!)"

Well, in fairness to The Donald, he wasn't asked about Hamas at all. And Hassan Nasrallah really isn't a threat to US security (neither is Hamas).

He should however know the names al-Zawahiri (leader of al-Qaeda), al-Baghdadi (leader of ISIS) and al-Julani (leader of the al-Nusra Front).

Hamas and Hezbollah are slightly different. In fact, Nasrallah is the mortal enemy of the other three, as Hezbollah is a Shia paramilitary group.
Let's keep it on topic, my Russian friend. Nit-picking a parenthetical comment doesn't advance the conversation, especially when anyone can click and listen the interview. Any comments on how a presidential candidate's racist rhetoric harms people of color?
Bryan Hudson said…
Great post. Thanks for sharing!
Bryan Hudson (A friend of your dad, Earl, and Major)
Boris Yeltsin said…
I disagree, Comrade Johnson. This is on topic.

Constant rhetoric on the part of the US media about the threat of "Hamas, Hezbollah, and al-Qaeda" is partially what causes this anxiety about "terrorism" and promotes bigotry against people of Middle Eastern and South Asian descent. There have been many attacks in the US and indeed murders against ordinary brown Americans simply because they "look like a terrorist". That is harming PoC in my book.

Hamas and Hezbollah are not security threats to the United States. Al-Qaeda is. The distinction is crucial.

You made the mistake, Comrade. Hamas was not mentioned.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Fair 'nuff. Indeed, terrorism by white supremacists has caused far more deaths in the US since 9/11 than anyone from these groups.

Homegrown Extremists Tied to Deadlier Toll Than Jihadists in U.S. Since 9/11

Popular posts from this blog

The Long Con

Hiding in Plain Sight

ESPN has a series of sports documentaries called 30 For 30. One of my favorites is called Broke which is about how professional athletes often make tens of millions of dollars in their careers yet retire with nothing. One of the major "leaks" turns out to be con artists, who lure athletes into elaborate real estate schemes or business ventures. This naturally raises the question: In a tightly-knit social structure that is a sports team, how can con artists operate so effectively and extensively? The answer is quite simple: very few people taken in by con artists ever tell anyone what happened. Thus, con artists can operate out in the open with little fear of consequences because they are shielded by the collective silence of their victims.
I can empathize with this. I've lost money in two different con schemes. One was when I was in college, and I received a phone call that I had won an all-expenses-paid trip to the Bahamas. All I needed to do was p…

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:


It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…