Skip to main content

Resonances

Start with a metal surface attached to an acoustic oscillator (a speaker). Add salt to the surface. Increase the frequency until the plate reaches its natural frequency, at which point standing waves are set up. The salt settles down along the nodal lines on the surface where the plate is relatively still. Similarly, salt grains are bounced out of the regions where the surface oscillates.



(I found this video on ThisIsColossal. h/t Bri for pointing me to the site.)

This is a 2-dimensional analogy of oscillations in the Sun. Hot material just below the Sun's surface rises in convective cells, which then "ping" the outer layers of the Sun. This pinging causes the Sun to oscillate and set up standing waves throughout it's 3-dimensional interior. Some of these vibration modes can be observed by making repeated measurements of the Sun's brightness as its surface oscillates.

An illustration of spherical harmonics in the Sun's interior. These harmonics can be measured by watching the Sun's (or another star's) brightness oscillate in time.

In principle, one could estimate the density of the plate in the video above by reading off the nature of its natural frequencies. Plates of different densities (made of different materials) will vibrate differently and give rise to patterns at different characteristic frequencies. The same goes for stars. Astronomers can read off the density of stars based on the fluctuations in their brightness, which allows them to measure their mass and radius.

This is one of the major side benefits of the Kepler mission. By making repeated brightness measurements (photometry) of hundreds of thousands of stars, the mission has discovered thousands of planet candidates. For some stars, their natural frequencies show up in the photometry, which enables the detection of planets and a characterization of the host star's physical properties. Science!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:


It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The subtle yet real racism of the Supreme Court

Judge Roberts, a member of the highest court in the land, which is currently hearing the sad story of mediocre college aspirant Abigail Fischer, recently asked, "What unique ­perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class? I’m just wondering what the benefits of diversity are in that situation?" 
Did you catch the white supremacy in this question? If not, don't feel bad because it's subtly hidden beneath the cloaking field of colorblind racism. (As for Scalia's ign'nt-ass statements, I'm not even...)
Try rephrasing the question: "What unique perspective does a white student bring to a physics classroom?" The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing! Why? Because race isn't biological, and is therefore not deterministic of cognitive abilities. Did you perhaps forget that you knew that when considering Roberts' question? If so, again, it's understandable. Our society and culture condition all of us to forget basic facts …