Skip to main content

Aw, my old department!

Campbell hall circa 1999 or 2011
Campbell Hall circa Feb 2012 (aw!)


Back in 2000 I was a eager young prospective grad student choosing between Caltech physics and Berkeley Astronomy for the next 7 years of my life. When I visited Robinson Hall at Caltech (well before the crazy orange Cahill building), all of the students were in the basement. When I visited Campbell hall at Berkeley, all of the students were on the roof in the Cosmic Garden. There was a telescope dome in the middle of a courtyard in which a lemon tree and flowers grew. A flight of stairs led up to a bird's eye view of the Berkeley campus from 8 floors up, as well as an amazing vista of San Francisco, Alcatraz and the Golden Gate Bridge.

After taking in the view from the roof of Campbell for the first time I knew it was time to drop my life's ambition of physics grad school at Caltech for a new career at UC Berkeley. So what if I had to learn a brand new subject, a new unit system, and learn to plot things backwards (astro is weird that way)? Seven years of that view, indie rock shows in San Fran, a Thai restaurant on every corner, and the prospect of short-author-list papers in my second year all made my decision pretty straight-forward.

Things have changed a lot at Berkeley since I left. Most notably, Campbell Hall with its Cosmic Garden are soon to be no more, to make room for a new Astronomy building. It's pretty sad, but I'm glad there will be a new start for Berkeley Astro.

BTW, being sad about an inanimate object reminded my former Berkeley classmate, Karin, of this Ikea commercial (wait for it...):


Comments

Karin said…
Wish I could be there to see it knocked down. It was a lovely place to work for [large number] of years.
Marshall said…
You're not the only one who had that response to the view from on top of Campbell! "Hmm, the attic of Campbell versus the sub-sub-basement of Robinson..." played a non-negligible role in my own thinking that same year... And man, the view from the old 6th floor classroom was totally worth it. :-)

Popular posts from this blog

An annual note to all the (NSF) haters

It's that time of year again: students have recently been notified about whether they received the prestigious NSF Graduate Student Research Fellowship. Known in the STEM community as "The NSF," the fellowship provides a student with three years of graduate school tuition and stipend, with the latter typically 5-10% above the standard institutional support for first- and second-year students. It's a sweet deal, and a real accellerant for young students to get their research career humming along smoothly because they don't need to restrict themselves to only advisors who have funding: the students fund themselves!
This is also the time of year that many a white dude executes what I call the "academic soccer flop." It looks kinda like this:


It typically sounds like this: "Congrats! Of course it's easier for you to win the NSF because you're, you know, the right demographic." Or worse: "She only won because she's Hispanic."…

Culture: Made Fresh Daily

There are two inspirations for this essay worth noting. The first is an impromptu talk I gave to the board of trustees at Thatcher School while I was visiting in October as an Anacapa Fellow. Spending time on this remarkable campus interacting with the students, faculty and staff helped solidify my notions about how culture can be intentionally created. The second source is Beam Times and Lifetimes by Sharon Tarweek, an in-depth exploration of the culture of particle physics told by an anthropologist embedded at SLAC for two decades. It's a fascinating look at the strange practices and norms that scientists take for granted.
One of the stories that scientists tell themselves, whether implicitly or explicitly, is that science exists outside of and independent of society. A corollary of this notion is that if a scientific subfield has a culture, e.g. the culture of astronomy vs. the culture of chemistry, that culture is essential rather than constructed. That is to say, scientific c…

The subtle yet real racism of the Supreme Court

Judge Roberts, a member of the highest court in the land, which is currently hearing the sad story of mediocre college aspirant Abigail Fischer, recently asked, "What unique ­perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class? I’m just wondering what the benefits of diversity are in that situation?" 
Did you catch the white supremacy in this question? If not, don't feel bad because it's subtly hidden beneath the cloaking field of colorblind racism. (As for Scalia's ign'nt-ass statements, I'm not even...)
Try rephrasing the question: "What unique perspective does a white student bring to a physics classroom?" The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing! Why? Because race isn't biological, and is therefore not deterministic of cognitive abilities. Did you perhaps forget that you knew that when considering Roberts' question? If so, again, it's understandable. Our society and culture condition all of us to forget basic facts …